I am an unapologetic owner of a dog. And a car. And said dog rides in said car. Which has its upsides and its downsides.
As a result, I have a dog-car. In fact, in our family, I have the dog car. As in, the only one he's welcome to ride in.
It's easy to identify a dog-car. Let me swipe an old conceit from David Letterman (from his pre-Ernest Hemingway beard) and inform you on how to tell if you own a dog-car:
Top Ten Signs You Own a Dog-Car
10. It is a make/model that is not a two-seater or a high-end sports car. It's some form of SUV with enough room to accommodate a crate (or crates).
9. The carpet contains enough embedded hair to knit a sweater.
8. The glove compartment has a stash of empty poop bags; the console between the front seats has dog treats
7. The license is either LOVZDOGS or the bumper has some dog-related sticker on it. Or both.
6. Opening the door releases the aromatic scent of citrus/lilac/pine-needles, attempting but epic-failing to erase the distinctive perfume of wet dog
5. Somewhere under one of the seats is an errant dog toy. Or if you're really inattentive, an errant toy dog.
4. It may be a payment or so behind schedule, owing to the budget-busting cost of a) canine medication; b) a vet bill; c) show entries; d) compensation for a neighbor's ruined flower beds; e) 2,392 items classified as "dog stuff"; or f) all of the above.
3. The interior has an abstract-art look to it, comprising flecks of mud that were produced after a rain shower when the dog hopped in the back and you uttered the panicked phrase "NO! NO SHAKE! DO NOT SHAKE!" just seconds too late.
2. Despite the number of meals you've eaten while driving, there is not one consumable crumb anywhere to be found. And come to think of it, that used Burger King wrapper is gone, too.
AND THE TOP SIGN YOU OWN A DOG-CAR (drrrrrrum-roll):
1. Windows. Nose-art. 'Nuff said.
Tuesday, August 28, 2018
Friday, June 15, 2018
Make 'Em Laugh!
From an item about a year ago from "The
Mirror," a daily British tabloid.
Two women were kicked out of a cinema for laughing out loud.
The movie they were ejected from was Absolutely
Fabulous, a 2016 comedy.
Some of the details are fuzzy -- reportedly,
nobody in the seats complained until theater management approached the ladies
in question. Apparently, the conversation that ensued is what other
movie-watchers found objectionable.
But whatever the source -- tee-hees or talking
-- the din was enough to give the pair the boot. They received a set of
complimentary passes on their way out. I guess the idea was to have them return
for a three-hankie weepy or a terrifying horror movie, where the respective
risks would be crying or screaming too loudly.
I have never been asked to leave a theater for
laughing too loud. I have, however, been chided by Kristin for my enthusiastic
response to big-screen funny business.
"Geez, dad! All I could hear was you going ‘HO-HO-HO!
HA-HA-HA!’ It was so embarrassing!!!"
I mean, who can help it? The Pink
Panther and Back to the Future and Ghostbusters are funny
and do warrant an audible, appreciable response. I remember
screaming in the theaters over Airplane
and the Naked Gun movies. And I
wasn’t alone.
I have noticed, though, that modern-day movie
audiences seem to be very reticent in the way they process a movie.
I remember seeing The Little Mermaid when
it came to theaters in 1989. The energy and dazzle of "Under the Sea"
was so impactful as a musical number that when the last chord of the song
sounded, the audience erupted in applause!
It was a beautiful demonstration of a shared experience
that a theater full of total strangers was compelled, in unison, to perform an
act that made no sense at all.
Think about it. Exactly who were
we applauding? It certainly wasn't singers/dancers in a live show. It was, I
guess, a set of animators, artists, musicians and singers who had done their
work months prior.
But I got it. The sequence was so inherently theatrical
that we responded theatrically.
Honestly, it was a little thrilling. It was
energizing. It was nostalgic. And it was wholly appropriate.
There's something about a large auditorium full
of people exploding in laughter at the same moment. It happens at concert halls
and comedy clubs and professional theaters all the time.
And it used to happen in the
movies, too. But not so much anymore.
I was thinking maybe it had to do with theater
size, that because they're no longer the cavernous spaces that fit hundreds of
people, audiences have lost the anonymity that allowed them the freedom to
burst out laughing and not be ridiculed for it.
Or maybe it's people becoming more aligned with
watching movies on personal devices. I don't think anyone would sit on the
subway watching a comedy on their iPad and physically laugh about some screen
gag.
Claire and I were discussing this and she rolled
her eyes: "This isn't yet one more thing you're going to blame on
Millennials, is it?"
"No," I said defensively. "....
um... Not really."
She did, however, see my point. "I'll laugh
at a comedian at a club, but not in a movie."
"Why?"
"I don't know... I don't want to disturb
anyone else."
"Well what about crying?" I asked.
"Crying can be quiet," she said.
"Nobody really needs to hear it."
Maybe it has something to do with movie comedies
that frankly aren't that funny. I never really appreciated the male-centric
slob comedies of the 1970s and 1980s (Animal House). So the 21st century
counterpart, the female-centric slob comedy (Bridesmaids), doesn't have
much appeal either.
All I know is this. Should you be seated near me
during a revival showing of, say, It's a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World,
don't expect me to hold it in.
I will laugh.
Out loud.
And hope I'm not ejected from the theater.
Wednesday, May 23, 2018
Thomas Wolfe Was Right
Nope: You can't go home again.
Not even virtually.
This is 4235 N. Marshall Street, Philadelphia, PA, via Google Streetview, dated July 2017.
This was the home of my paternal grandparents.
It was a place of parties and visits, of overnights, of Thanksgivings and Christmases.
Of springerle cookies, tall birthday cakes, personalized bags of Halloween candy and large Easter eggs with our names scripted on them in white icing.
It was where we reconnected with cousins, watched home movies from a whirring projector and sang while washing/drying dishes.
It's where Sunday dinners ended with the family gathering in front of the TV to watch Disney's The Wonderful World of Color, and where we as kids protested mightily if Dad suggested we leave before the show ended.
The concrete pad in the photo above used to be a small but lush patch of lawn that my Pop-Pop kept neat and tidy with the help of a rotary push-mower.
Those gates hide a porch that was once shaded by a set of green-striped awnings. Hanging those awnings every spring was a task that Dad was often asked to help with (apparently it was quite a struggle), but the comfort they offered from the setting summer sun made the task worthwhile.
There was also furniture on that porch, including a lounge chair that tipped upward, raising the occupant's feet for added comfort. I remember us as kids -- cousins, neighbor kids, brothers and me -- piling on that chair and screaming with laughter when it would unexpectedly tip.
I remember that house vividly.
When we would occasionally stay over and it was time to go to bed, we were told to to go "...up the wooden hill," which meant to climb the staircase to the second floor. We were also reminded to "scrub our teeth" rather than brush them.
I remember the upstairs bathroom had a skylight, which I thought was very cool.
And the basement had a separate toilet... not a full bath, but a commode that came in handy when traffic upstairs was heavy.
That basement also had a thousand treasures. Pop-pop would project home movies -- shots of people we didn't even know -- but he would hold our interest by running the films backward and cracking us up.
He also liked to use a screwdriver to short out the front doorbell. We would stifle giggles at the sound of Nana walking to the front door, only to find nobody there.
So many memories: Their silvery artificial Christmas tree. The scroll on the end of the bannister as it landed in the living room. The step-stool/seat in the kitchen. Their small garbage can on the back stoop. The fence in the backyard, with its iron humps. The twin beds that, when we kids stayed over, could be pushed together to make one large place for three brothers to sleep.
Those sleepovers often also involved a trip to the zoo, which Pop-pop loved. And a walk on Sunday morning to Mass at nearby St. Henry Parish.
My great-grandmother -- Pop-pop's mom who lived with them -- had "her" chair in the living room, from which she watched Lawrence Welk on television.
That home was the site of my first encounter with a color TV set.
And a window air conditioner. I remember escaping the summer swelter by just standing in front of its adjustable louvres.
I also remember that Dad and I would often travel there on Sundays after Mass for a visit. My brothers were other-occupied, and Mom was sleeping after a night-shift as a nurse. So Dad and I would drive in, bringing a box of donuts. We would gather at the kitchen table and just talk.
I don't recall the exact timeline of my grandparents departure from that house. I know Pop-pop died there in the early 1980s. Nana continued to live there alone, much to the concern of the rest of the family. I know she was there as late as the mid-1980s because when I studied abroad in London in Spring 1984, I sent her an Easter card that she saved. And the address is 4235 N. Marshall.
She saved that card. I have it now.
Nana understandably but regrettably sold the house at one point, driven out by a decreased ability to attend to the upkeep and an increased worry about her security.
She moved a few times after that, continuing to live on her own after her husband passed. As the years rolled on, she needed full-time nursing care and was put into a facility where her safety and health were assured. She passed away at 103.
The Marshall Street house remains. Not in its former glory, but it's still there. And I guess there's something to say for that.
And if ghosts do exist, whoever lives there, when things are quiet-quiet, may just hear singing from the kitchen.
As if someone washing and drying dishes is easing the task by humming a tune.
Not even virtually.
This is 4235 N. Marshall Street, Philadelphia, PA, via Google Streetview, dated July 2017.
This was the home of my paternal grandparents.
It was a place of parties and visits, of overnights, of Thanksgivings and Christmases.
Of springerle cookies, tall birthday cakes, personalized bags of Halloween candy and large Easter eggs with our names scripted on them in white icing.
It was where we reconnected with cousins, watched home movies from a whirring projector and sang while washing/drying dishes.
It's where Sunday dinners ended with the family gathering in front of the TV to watch Disney's The Wonderful World of Color, and where we as kids protested mightily if Dad suggested we leave before the show ended.
The concrete pad in the photo above used to be a small but lush patch of lawn that my Pop-Pop kept neat and tidy with the help of a rotary push-mower.
Those gates hide a porch that was once shaded by a set of green-striped awnings. Hanging those awnings every spring was a task that Dad was often asked to help with (apparently it was quite a struggle), but the comfort they offered from the setting summer sun made the task worthwhile.
There was also furniture on that porch, including a lounge chair that tipped upward, raising the occupant's feet for added comfort. I remember us as kids -- cousins, neighbor kids, brothers and me -- piling on that chair and screaming with laughter when it would unexpectedly tip.
I remember that house vividly.
When we would occasionally stay over and it was time to go to bed, we were told to to go "...up the wooden hill," which meant to climb the staircase to the second floor. We were also reminded to "scrub our teeth" rather than brush them.
I remember the upstairs bathroom had a skylight, which I thought was very cool.
And the basement had a separate toilet... not a full bath, but a commode that came in handy when traffic upstairs was heavy.
That basement also had a thousand treasures. Pop-pop would project home movies -- shots of people we didn't even know -- but he would hold our interest by running the films backward and cracking us up.
He also liked to use a screwdriver to short out the front doorbell. We would stifle giggles at the sound of Nana walking to the front door, only to find nobody there.
So many memories: Their silvery artificial Christmas tree. The scroll on the end of the bannister as it landed in the living room. The step-stool/seat in the kitchen. Their small garbage can on the back stoop. The fence in the backyard, with its iron humps. The twin beds that, when we kids stayed over, could be pushed together to make one large place for three brothers to sleep.
Those sleepovers often also involved a trip to the zoo, which Pop-pop loved. And a walk on Sunday morning to Mass at nearby St. Henry Parish.
My great-grandmother -- Pop-pop's mom who lived with them -- had "her" chair in the living room, from which she watched Lawrence Welk on television.
That home was the site of my first encounter with a color TV set.
And a window air conditioner. I remember escaping the summer swelter by just standing in front of its adjustable louvres.
I also remember that Dad and I would often travel there on Sundays after Mass for a visit. My brothers were other-occupied, and Mom was sleeping after a night-shift as a nurse. So Dad and I would drive in, bringing a box of donuts. We would gather at the kitchen table and just talk.
I don't recall the exact timeline of my grandparents departure from that house. I know Pop-pop died there in the early 1980s. Nana continued to live there alone, much to the concern of the rest of the family. I know she was there as late as the mid-1980s because when I studied abroad in London in Spring 1984, I sent her an Easter card that she saved. And the address is 4235 N. Marshall.
She saved that card. I have it now.
Nana understandably but regrettably sold the house at one point, driven out by a decreased ability to attend to the upkeep and an increased worry about her security.
She moved a few times after that, continuing to live on her own after her husband passed. As the years rolled on, she needed full-time nursing care and was put into a facility where her safety and health were assured. She passed away at 103.
The Marshall Street house remains. Not in its former glory, but it's still there. And I guess there's something to say for that.
And if ghosts do exist, whoever lives there, when things are quiet-quiet, may just hear singing from the kitchen.
As if someone washing and drying dishes is easing the task by humming a tune.
Wednesday, May 9, 2018
Mulch Ado about Nothing
This past weekend, I celebrated Mulch Day.
Mulch Day in our house is the one day a year when I roll up my sleeves and clean up the bed in front of our house.
And truth be told, as noted prior. I'm not a big fan of Mulch Day.
Maybe it's because the whole concept of mulch was foreign to me.
I came from a non-mulch home. Growing up, we never mulched anything. We mowed the lawn. We pulled crabgrass here and there. Maybe planted a bulb or two.
But nothing on the order of Mulch Day.
There really was no need. My childhood home had a similar bed out front, below the picture window that looked into the living room. But it had some kind of ground cover -- I want to say pachysandra, but I'm not sure -- that rendered mulch superfluous.
But our home now has no such eye candy. And Eileen comes from a family that was firmly devoted to mulch.
So each spring, I do a general cleanup of the bed and end it all with a coating of moist, black, shredded, smelly wood chips.
There's something from the Myth of Sissyphus about all this: I pull every weed. I spray those tiny ones that are emergent. I trim the bushes. And I lay the mulch.
And initially, it's all neat and tidy.
But generally, before July 4, the bed's a mess again. The weeds have shoved their way back into prominence; much of the mulch has disappeared (where does mulch go? Does it blow away? Is it removed by birds? Do squirrels eat it? I have 0 understanding of where $120 for 12 bags of mulch goes in a mere handful of weeks); and the bushes need a haircut once more.
It's a sweaty, muscle-aching, sunburny job.
I will say that it all looks so nice when I'm finished.
And I do enjoy that it seems to herald the firm arrival of spring.
But all things equal, if we're talking about "days" in May, this much is true:
I much prefer the leisure of Memorial Day to the work of Mulch Day.
Mulch Day in our house is the one day a year when I roll up my sleeves and clean up the bed in front of our house.
And truth be told, as noted prior. I'm not a big fan of Mulch Day.
Maybe it's because the whole concept of mulch was foreign to me.
I came from a non-mulch home. Growing up, we never mulched anything. We mowed the lawn. We pulled crabgrass here and there. Maybe planted a bulb or two.
But nothing on the order of Mulch Day.
There really was no need. My childhood home had a similar bed out front, below the picture window that looked into the living room. But it had some kind of ground cover -- I want to say pachysandra, but I'm not sure -- that rendered mulch superfluous.
But our home now has no such eye candy. And Eileen comes from a family that was firmly devoted to mulch.
So each spring, I do a general cleanup of the bed and end it all with a coating of moist, black, shredded, smelly wood chips.
There's something from the Myth of Sissyphus about all this: I pull every weed. I spray those tiny ones that are emergent. I trim the bushes. And I lay the mulch.
And initially, it's all neat and tidy.
But generally, before July 4, the bed's a mess again. The weeds have shoved their way back into prominence; much of the mulch has disappeared (where does mulch go? Does it blow away? Is it removed by birds? Do squirrels eat it? I have 0 understanding of where $120 for 12 bags of mulch goes in a mere handful of weeks); and the bushes need a haircut once more.
It's a sweaty, muscle-aching, sunburny job.
I will say that it all looks so nice when I'm finished.
And I do enjoy that it seems to herald the firm arrival of spring.
But all things equal, if we're talking about "days" in May, this much is true:
I much prefer the leisure of Memorial Day to the work of Mulch Day.
Thursday, May 3, 2018
Leap of Faith, Three Letters... Answer? Pen
I've written here in the past about my love of Scrabble (actually, two posts, both almost verbatim... my blog-memory for topics isn't as sharp as it should be).
As noted (twice), I inherited my talent with tiles and two-letter words from my Mom.
From Dad, however, I inherited a different word skill: tackling each Sunday's big-sized New York Times crossword puzzle.
This arrangement is the exact opposite of the Scrabble tradition:
Whereas Scrabble was driven by Mom and shunned by Dad, the NYT puzzle was a Dad-favorite that Mom had little patience for.
Actually, she would attempt it. But she somehow couldn't wrap her head around the themes. And the wordplay -- rather than intriguing her -- seemed to annoy her.
She also had a nasty habit of working the puzzle in pen, which was against Dad's 11th Commandment:
Thou shalt never work the NYT crossword in pen!
Side note: I actually did this -- worked a puzzle in ink -- for the first time about three weeks ago. We were on a long flight, and I had packed the puzzle in my carry-on but neglected to pack a pencil. I borrowed a pen from Eileen (airports apparently don't sell pencils), held my breath and dug in.
Actually, things turned out pretty well.
The tips I've learned in tackling crosswords all came from Dad. He taught me, for example, that if a clue is plural, so is the answer. So, for example, a clue of "Alleyway Felines" would be CATS; whereas a clue reading "Alleyway Feline" would be CAT.
And that if the clue contains an abbreviation, so does the answer.
And that the overall theme of a puzzle is usually a play on words or a series of truly groan-worthy puns.
And that there is value in putting a puzzle down for a while and coming back later. Sometimes, he would say, a fresh perspective brings a couple more answers.
... and that's a truism that applies to life itself, as well as crossword puzzles.
Dad and I would work these puzzles together throughout the week. The folded paper would rest on the kitchen table or in the living room, and when one of us felt up to the task, we'd pick it up and pore over the open spaces.
When Dad would dig in for a while and then realize he had hit a series of dead ends, he would hand the page to me and always say the same thing:
"I finished all the hard ones; you can finish the easy ones."
Yeah, right.
Although I've done other crosswords -- those in our daily newspaper, for example, or the enterainment-oriented ones that used to show up in our published television listings -- the only one that I've stuck with is NYT. A lot of the others are stupidly easy, which erases all the fun. A puzzle that can be completed accurately in 20 minutes is a puzzle that's not worth doing.
My collaborations with Dad on the NYT crossword faded over time. When I moved out and got married, sharing the puzzle became too difficult. But we would often discuss our progress when talking on the phone.
His passing in 2006 put an end to our tag-team solving.
But I'm still at it.
And every now and then, when I get stumped, I imagine him looking over my shoulder and offering a hint or two.
Or suggesting a different read on a clue.
Or pointing out an error.
Which makes it a good thing that I work in pencil.
As noted (twice), I inherited my talent with tiles and two-letter words from my Mom.
From Dad, however, I inherited a different word skill: tackling each Sunday's big-sized New York Times crossword puzzle.
This arrangement is the exact opposite of the Scrabble tradition:
Whereas Scrabble was driven by Mom and shunned by Dad, the NYT puzzle was a Dad-favorite that Mom had little patience for.
Actually, she would attempt it. But she somehow couldn't wrap her head around the themes. And the wordplay -- rather than intriguing her -- seemed to annoy her.
She also had a nasty habit of working the puzzle in pen, which was against Dad's 11th Commandment:
Thou shalt never work the NYT crossword in pen!
Side note: I actually did this -- worked a puzzle in ink -- for the first time about three weeks ago. We were on a long flight, and I had packed the puzzle in my carry-on but neglected to pack a pencil. I borrowed a pen from Eileen (airports apparently don't sell pencils), held my breath and dug in.
Actually, things turned out pretty well.
The tips I've learned in tackling crosswords all came from Dad. He taught me, for example, that if a clue is plural, so is the answer. So, for example, a clue of "Alleyway Felines" would be CATS; whereas a clue reading "Alleyway Feline" would be CAT.
And that if the clue contains an abbreviation, so does the answer.
And that the overall theme of a puzzle is usually a play on words or a series of truly groan-worthy puns.
And that there is value in putting a puzzle down for a while and coming back later. Sometimes, he would say, a fresh perspective brings a couple more answers.
... and that's a truism that applies to life itself, as well as crossword puzzles.
Dad and I would work these puzzles together throughout the week. The folded paper would rest on the kitchen table or in the living room, and when one of us felt up to the task, we'd pick it up and pore over the open spaces.
When Dad would dig in for a while and then realize he had hit a series of dead ends, he would hand the page to me and always say the same thing:
"I finished all the hard ones; you can finish the easy ones."
Yeah, right.
Although I've done other crosswords -- those in our daily newspaper, for example, or the enterainment-oriented ones that used to show up in our published television listings -- the only one that I've stuck with is NYT. A lot of the others are stupidly easy, which erases all the fun. A puzzle that can be completed accurately in 20 minutes is a puzzle that's not worth doing.
My collaborations with Dad on the NYT crossword faded over time. When I moved out and got married, sharing the puzzle became too difficult. But we would often discuss our progress when talking on the phone.
His passing in 2006 put an end to our tag-team solving.
But I'm still at it.
And every now and then, when I get stumped, I imagine him looking over my shoulder and offering a hint or two.
Or suggesting a different read on a clue.
Or pointing out an error.
Which makes it a good thing that I work in pencil.
Monday, January 29, 2018
Eagles' Wings
When I
was growing up, my mother abhorred the idea of a TV in the living room. So our
television was in my parents’ bedroom.
My bedroom was next to
theirs. On winter-fall Sunday afternoons, that meant I was within full earshot
of mom and dad’s viewing of the ups – and many downs – of the Philadelphia
Eagles.
I
remember clearly sitting at my desk and hearing not only the audio of the
broadcast (Tom Brookshire) but also the encouraging comments of my parents,
both mega-Eagles fans:
“…go,
go GO! GOOO!”
“Get ‘im…
get ‘im… GET ‘IM!”
“NO!
NO! NO! NO! NO! NOOOOOO!”
Through
this din I would shoulder on, trying to study World War II, the tragedies of
William Shakespeare and the Periodic Table of the Elements.
I’m not
sure where my dad got to be so attached to the Philadelphia Eagles, but he was
devout. And my mom was right there beside him. When it came to the Eagles, they
were a match made in heaven.
What
pains me at this stage in my life is the level of distain I had for it all back
then.
I’m not
even sure why.
Maybe
it was the struggle of trying to study with all that cheering (or,
more accurately, groaning) going on.
Maybe
it was growing up with two brothers who played football and being dragged to
games I didn’t understand and wasn’t interested in.
Maybe
it was how all-encompassing it was: If we went to a party or a dinner where a
game was on, every other kind of interaction ceased. Further, even courteous
conversation was shushed, with all eyes glued to the screen.
Maybe
it was the general sense of asserting my independence. If my parents liked it,
I must immediately dislike it.
I don’t
know. But for years, I hated the Eagles and had no interest.
Until…
When
our kids were little, I started gravitating toward the game.
Something
about it caught my attention. It wasn’t like other sports on TV: Baseball was a
snoozefest, full of long stretches where seemingly nothing was happening.
Basketball and hockey had the opposite drawback: too frantic.
Football,
however, was accessible. I "got" it.
It was
like watching an hour-long war. Turf gained. Turf lost. Field soldiers each
doing his job. Coaches overseeing the big picture. Plenty of plotting and
planning, with enough wiggle room for Lady Luck to sweep in and take a hand.
I
learned to love it.
And
fortunately, I came to appreciate the game while my parents were still alive.
So I
now have the fond memories of enjoying televised games with Mom & Dad. As
do our girls, who remember nestling in and cheering the Eagles.
Which
makes this year all the more poignant.
I know
my parents have their eyes set on Minneapolis from up above. They have dyed
their white wings to a slick Midnight Green. I also know my sister-in-law Kathy
is right there with them, a green Eagles hat stretched over her halo.
I’ve heard of fans who wept
at last week’s win.
I
screamed my voice raw over the game. But when the final gun sounded and we
emerged on top – underdogs all the way – I did not cry.
This
week, however, knowing what I know, living what I’ve lived, growing up in the
house I grew up in, having the Eagles-fan parents I had…
Should
the stars align and we come out on top.
Well, my joy may just overflow onto my cheeks.
GO
EAGLES!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)